Discipline and Dismissal

Breaking News



Ivan Israelstam

 

Employers need to understand that:

  • Labour law definitely does allow employers to dismiss employees.
  • The CCMA has frequently upheld the dismissal of employees fired for misconduct. We have been directly involved in a great many cases where employees have been fired and, after appealing to the CCMA, have remained fired.
  • It is not the firing of employees that the law has a problem with. It is not dismissals that raise the ire of CCMA arbitrators. Instead, it is unfair dismissals that result in the employer being forced to reinstate the employee and/or being forced to pay the employee exorbitant amounts of money in compensation.
  • In order to be free to fire employees who deserve dismissal employers need to understand and accept the difference between fair and unfair dismissal. This is because, if the employer has an employee who is causing mayhem or is costing the employer money or is threatening the security of the business or is otherwise undesirable, the employer cannot afford for the employee to be reinstated. The reason for this is that it is exceptionally difficult later to dismiss or discipline an employee who has been reinstated by the CCMA or other tribunal.

 

So while the law does allow dismissals it also requires the employer to be able to prove that the dismissal was both procedurally and substantively fair.

 

“Procedurally fair” relates to whether the employee was given a fair hearing.

 

Whether a dismissal is “substantively fair” relates to the fairness of the dismissal decision itself rather than to the disciplinary procedures. Specifically, for the dismissal to be adjudged to be substantively fair, the employer would have to show that:

  • The employee really did break the rule
  • The rule was a fair one
  • The penalty of dismissal was a fitting one in the light of the severity of the offence. AND
  • The employee knew or should have known the rule.

Properly trained CCMA arbitrators consider all the above factors together with the circumstances of each individual case in deciding if a dismissal was fair and whether the employee should stay dismissed or should be reinstated.

 

In the case of White vs Pinnacle Point Investments (Pty) ltd (2008, 1 BALR 91) White took up a post with the employer as CEO. Thereafter the employer discovered that White was in dispute with his previous employer which also happened to be the bank used by the new employer. The new employer then dismissed the employee claiming that the reason for the dismissal was the employee’s refusal to divulge the true reason for the dispute with the old employer. It also claimed that it had failed to hold a disciplinary hearing because of exceptional circumstances.

 

The arbitrator decided that:

  • There were no exceptional circumstances justifying the failure to hold a hearing. Believing the outcome to be a fait accompli does not exempt the employer from giving the employee an opportunity to be heard
  • The reason for the dismissal was not that the employee had failed to divulge the true reason for his dispute with the bank. Instead, the true reason was pressure from the bank on the employer to fire the employee
  • The employer had not held its own investigation into the bank’s allegation that the bank’s money had found its way into the employee’s bank account.
  • The dismissal was procedurally and substantively unfair
  • The employer was to compensate the employee for the unfair dismissal.

 

The outcome of this case shows that employers will lose if they merely take the word of a third party as to the guilt of an employee or if they succumb to pressure from the third party to dismiss the employee.

 

lvan lsraelstam is the Chief Executive of Labour Law Management Consulting. He may be contacted on (011) 888-7944 or 0828522973 or on e-mail address: or www.labourlawadvice.co.za.

Courses and Workshops

Our Clients

 

Basic Labour Relations

28 March 2018

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

POPI: Protection of Personal Information Act

29 March 2018 (Fully Booked)

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

13 April 2018

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

11 May 2018

Protea Hotel By Marriott Tyger Valley: Cape Town

The OHS Act and the Responsibilities of Management

04 April 2018

Southern Sun Hotel: OR Tambo International Airport

06 April 2018: Southern Sun

Elangeni & Maharani, Maharani Towers: Durban

Occupational injuries and diseases in the workplace

05 April 2018: Southern Sun

Elangeni & Maharani, Maharani Towers: Durban

12 April 2018

Southern Sun Hotel : OR Tambo International Airport

Employment Equity Committee Training

06 April 2018 (Fully Booked)

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

18 April 2018

Southern Sun: Elangeni & Maharani, Elangeni Towers: Durban

11 May 2018

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

18 May 2018

Protea Hotel By Marriott Tyger Valley: Cape Town

Skills Development Legislation and Review

11 April 2018

Southern Sun Hotel: OR Tambo International Airport

13 April 2018

Protea Hotel By Marriott Tyger Valley: Cape Town

19 April 2018

Southern Sun: Elangeni & Maharani, Maharani Towers: Durban

Managing Day to Day Issues/ Problem Employees Full day workshop

19 April 2018

Emperors Palace: Convention Centre

10 May 2018

Protea Hotel By Marriott Tyger Valley: Cape Town